What Are the Key Differences Between Corgi and Newfront Commercial Auto Insurance?
Trucking Liability vs. Broader Casualty Program
Newfront’s casualty practice lists auto liability alongside general liability, products, workers’ compensation and umbrella, with claims advocacy and risk-control resources. Choose Corgi if you need trucking-specific MCS-90 and state filings; choose Newfront if auto liability belongs in a wider casualty program. [3] [7]
Motor-Carrier Terms Versus a Coverage Label
Corgi describes MCS-90, required state filings at bind, and liability up to $1 million with SIR options. Newfront lists Auto Liability among key casualty coverages beside general liability, product liability, workers’ compensation, umbrella, and environmental lines. Newfront’s casualty page does not describe auto-specific endorsements, MCS-90, or published auto limits. [3] [7]
Claims Advocacy and Risk Control
Newfront says its casualty claims advocacy team manages claims through resolution, which would include an auto liability claim, and that the casualty practice provides integrated risk control and market intelligence from carrier relationships. Corgi’s reviewed trucking pages do not describe claims advocacy, risk-control consulting, or market-intelligence services for this line. [7] [3]
What Should You Confirm in Corgi and Newfront Commercial Auto Insurance Quotes?
- Ask both who the insurer is; Corgi and Newfront do not name it on the reviewed pages. [3] [7]
- Compare Corgi’s advertised $1 million / SIR structure with whatever auto limits and deductibles appear on a Newfront quote; the casualty page does not publish those figures. [3] [7]
- Confirm MCS-90 and state filings on Corgi, and whether a Newfront placement includes those motor-carrier filings. [3] [7]
- Ask Newfront how claims advocacy works on an auto loss, which Corgi’s reviewed pages do not describe. [7] [3]